Are Digital Twins Just Virtual or a Reality for Life Science Insights?

The Challenge

Traditional market research methods face significant hurdles when addressing complex and evolving topics like gene therapy. High costs, lengthy timelines, and difficulty accessing niche audiences often limit the ability to deliver timely, actionable insights. How could digital twins, powered by AI, address these barriers while maintaining the rigor and reliability of human-driven research?

Our Approach

To tackle these challenges, Sparq Intelligence developed and validated AI-driven digital twins to simulate physician decision-making processes.

  • Data Collection
    We began by collecting primary research data from 200 U.S.-based physicians. The survey explored their use, perceptions, and decision-making processes related to gene therapies, forming the foundation for training our digital twins.
  • Digital Twin Development
    Using the collected dataset, we trained AI-powered digital twin models capable of mimicking the thought processes, behaviors, and attitudes of these physicians. This simulation enabled us to test hypotheses and generate insights at scale.
  • Validation
    To ensure reliability, we compared the digital twins’ outputs against a holdout dataset of human responses. The twins mirrored human data closely across multiple metrics, demonstrating their ability to replicate nuanced decision-making processes.

The Results

The project revealed promising outcomes, underscoring the potential of digital twins to transform market research:

  • Accuracy: Digital twins consistently aligned with human insights, showcasing high fidelity in their simulated responses.
  • Speed: Once trained, the digital twin approach reduced research timelines by over 75%, delivering insights in days rather than months.
  • Cost Efficiency: Once trained, the cost of leveraging digital twins was significantly less than that of a traditional market research study.
    Scalability: Once trained, the digital twins provided a reusable framework for testing additional scenarios without starting new research cycles.
  • Hard-to-Reach Audiences: Digital twins offered a scalable way to study niche groups, such as specialists in rare diseases or geographically dispersed physicians.

Conclusion

The initial results provide proof of concept that digital twins can mirror human data with remarkable precision. Beyond just a technological novelty, they represent a transformative shift in how life sciences organizations can gather insights.

By blending AI-powered efficiency with rigorous human oversight, Sparq Intelligence empowers healthcare decision-makers to act quickly and confidently. This case study underscores the potential of digital twins to accelerate innovation and support smarter, more informed decisions in an ever-changing healthcare landscape.

Related Case Studies

Read More

Agile Answers: How AI Transformed a Product Launch

More from the Blog

Read More

Humanizing Patient Research Through AI

It’s been a month since Rare Disease Day — a time every year when many learn about and support…

Read More

Traditional vs AI Research: Which is Right for Your Business?

With the rise of AI-powered research tools, companies face a pivotal choice: stick with traditional…

Read More

The Evolving Role of AI-Powered Interviews in Research

What are AI-Powered Interviews? Conversational AI has evolved from simple rule-based chatbots into…

Read More

Breaking Down Sparq’s BRAIN Framework™ for Responsible AI

Artificial intelligence is reshaping industries, accelerating research, and enhancing…

Read More

Where Digital Twins Go Wrong (And 3 Ways You Can Avoid These Pitfalls)

Developing Digital Twins from market research allows brand teams to explore and emulate how an…

Read More

AI-Powered Market Research: Transforming Insights in 2025

Last year, I attended a conference with a client-side roundtable. One of the speakers made a…

Accreditation

Speed and accuracy are critical: decision-makers are often tasked to do more, with less. Decisions may be made without enough insight to guide strategy.

32-year old Female
28-year old Male
35-year old Male
60-year old Female
40-year old Male
Built by Researchers.
Powered by AI.
Built by Researchers.
Powered by AI.
Built by Researchers.
Powered by AI.
Built by Researchers.
Powered by AI.